All In Good Taste

by Melissa Radin
June 2010

Recently the cause blogosphere has been abuzz about fast food restaurants partnering with health-related nonprofits: KFC’s ‘Buckets for the Cure’ to benefit Susan G. Komen® for the Cure and White Castle’s hamburger-and-onion scented candle for Autism. Some of the industry’s most well-known bloggers tend to agree that these kinds of partnerships are distasteful and, over the long run will do more harm than good to consumers and the cause.
At the heart of their argument is the point that regardless of the money raised through these programs, much more money will need to be spent to educate people about the importance of healthily nutrition to prevent the very diseases the nonprofits are trying to cure. Furthermore, the cost of pain and suffering in treating the disease will be significant unless health-related nonprofits find corporate partners who are equally as committed as they are in the systemic change needed to make an impact.
I see the point, and don’t disagree, but I don’t think the answer is that fast food restaurants and health related nonprofits can’t mingle their brands. On the contrary, I think there is much to be gained through these kinds of relationships – IF they are built in a transparent and mission-driven fashion. They can raise money for the cause while increasing the brand’s equity; and can, for some, become the beacon to draw consumers’ attention to healthier menu options.
Importantly, these kinds of partnerships can also become the impetus for significant change within a company. From improving employee health benefits and programs to the development of healthier menu options, maybe even the elimination of unhealthy ingredients, these partnerships can have a lasting and positive impact.
I’m not here to speak for or against Komen’s actions. Although we have represented the organization, our company did not work on this particular sponsorship. We’ve worked for lots of brands and nonprofits in the cause space, such as P&G and Yoplait, as well as a slew of health-related nonprofits such as American Diabetes Association (ADA), America on the Move, and Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (JDRF). We’ve provided many of them with award-winning programs as well as helped them select and manage appropriate partners.
We’ve gathered some key learnings along the way:
Know your goal. Corporations need to think through what is the ultimate goal of the partnership. Most likely the main goal is to sell product and raise funds. Generally speaking, with most non-food/health-related cause partnerships this goal is easily attained. But when it comes to fast food and health causes this goal will not always work out, instead turning your company into a lighting rod for bad press.
A more productive route may be to realize what fast food has going for it – massive consumer awareness and lots and lots of foot traffic. Leverage those key assets to educate the public about their health risks.
Think out of the product box. Don’t get stuck in a rut and think that the cause marketing promotion has to be tied to the sponsor’s product – as in buy this and we’ll make a donation. When it fits, great – like buy Yoplait and money goes to Komen. But lots of times when a health-related cause joins hands with a food company it is not that easy.
But you can raise money for the cause and educate consumers through another kind of donation mechanism. Get creative and imagine other non-related products that can be co-branded (e.g., candles, scarves, iTunes) that consumers would enjoy purchasing to raise money for the cause. I know pin-up programs work great in highly trafficked places with multiple locations. Ask consumers to purchase them for $X made and the restaurant donates $X made to the cause.
Set criteria. In better economic times, nonprofits were becoming quite adept at forming criteria with corporations as a condition of forming a partnership. Many causes sat in the drivers’ seat demanding companies clean up their acts through sponsorship criteria. But with funds harder to come by and research just as important as it always was, many causes have had to give some to get some.
Nonetheless, when forming a partnership with a food company, health-related nonprofits should require serious commitments. From small changes like encouraging employees to be healthy at work, to requiring serious commitments like changing the way companies manufacture and market products – it can make a big difference.
Messaging really matters. Don’t let the promotion overshadow the cause message. Things will go amuck when moving product to generate revenue for the company eclipses the need to raise awareness and educate consumers about the issue. I heard recently that in Komen’s case they felt that aligning with KFC gave them the opportunity to educate a demographic that is terribly at risk, that they would otherwise not have been able to effectively reach. Unfortunately, this was not the take-a-way message people heard as they watched the ads.
Balance is key – you must bake educational messages into your cause marketing promotions. And you’ll have lots of opportunities to do this if you are working with a food product because there is always a ton of online and offline real estate for marketing. Consumers can learn a lot from in-store POS (take ones, shelf talkers, etc.) and product packaging.
No question there is a lot to digest when embarking on these types of partnerships. So whether you you’re a food corporation or a health related nonprofit we hope you’ll now have the appetite to consume them in good taste.
Melissa Radin
Principal, Group Strategy Director of Cause at PowerPact
Meissa runs the cause group at PowerPact, a leading consumer promotions agency (www.powerpact.com). Over the past eight years, she’s led award-winning work for Sanofi Aventis, Yoplait, and P&G as well as helped steer nationally-recognized nonprofits toward successful partnerships and programs. Her philosophy is that cause partnerships can do more than just do good, they can do good business. Finding that balance is what she does best.

Recently the cause blogosphere has been abuzz about fast food restaurants partnering with health-related nonprofits: KFC’s ‘Buckets for the Cure’ to benefit Susan G. Komen® for the Cure and White Castle’s hamburger-and-onion scented candle for Autism. Some of the industry’s most well-known bloggers tend to agree that these kinds of partnerships are distasteful and, over the long run will do more harm than good to consumers and the cause.

At the heart of their argument is the point that regardless of the money raised through these programs, much more money will need to be spent to educate people about the importance of healthily nutrition to prevent the very diseases the nonprofits are trying to cure. Furthermore, the cost of pain and suffering in treating the disease will be significant unless health-related nonprofits find corporate partners who are equally as committed as they are in the systemic change needed to make an impact. … Read More >>

Reaching Shoppers On Their Terms

by Ronda Sherman
November 2009

Reaching Shoppers On Their Terms

Since the late 90s when we began our Shopper Marketing work with P&G, we’ve helped many manufacturer and retail clients improve sales results with what we now call Shopper-Led Marketing.

At PowerPact, we think the Shopper Marketing model needs to evolve to follow the shopper whenever and whereever they’re in a shopping mindset. In today’s consumer-led Web 2.0 world, that can be way before “the last three feet” in front of the shelf. And yet, because of the past decade’s focus on research at the last three feet, our industry has developed a shopper-centric philosophy focused primarily on in-store marketing. That’s not to say that in-store marketing isn’t worthy of focus. … Read More >>

Compassion Fatigue

by Melissa Radin
October 2009

Pink. Online or in-store any day in October you’ll see pink ribbons, pink logos and pink symbols, all supporting the worthy breast cancer cause. This celebration of pink at first seems like a winning equation for both brands and nonprofits: but is too much of a good thing too much? Take a walk down any street in America and notice how many people just aren’t wearing yellow bracelets any more. Instead you’ll see red, the new love color of the day, thanks to Bono’s creation of Project Red. What’s the deal? Is pink and yellow out and red in? Probably, but red won’t be in for long if we don’t change the way we market causes.

So many causes supported by so many brands looks to consumers that everyone is doing the same thing. People simply can’t connect which brand goes with which cause. They don’t know who supports what. So they support nothing. … Read More >>

Big Ideas Are Truthful

by joost Hulsbosch
June 2009

Power Ideas Are Truthful

BIG IDEAS ARE TRUTHFUL, deep-seated convictions and rooted in what a product can do for you.  They want the world to be better off.  They are the key to a high ground no one else can claim.  When everyone has the same technology and the same products, ideas make you unique, Ideas have the power to inspire, to make small things big and to hold big things together.

IDEAS ARE RALLYING CRIES IN A DIZZYING, CONFUSING WORLD WHERE PEOPLE CONSTANTLY SEARCH FOR MEANING.  They stand for something.  People are drawn by their sense of purpose.  Ideas make people want to be part of what’s happening.  Ideas make people love your brand.  Or buy your product. Or want to work for you.  Or invest in you.  Big ideas dissolve the boundaries between consumers and brands.  They make us all want to belong to the same cause, commitment or concern. … Read More >>

The Consumer Is A Hijacker

by Frenchie Guajardo
March 2009

The Consumer Is A Hijacker

The consumer is a hijacker, a burglar and a gangster.  The consumer is now holding big companies for ransom in ways that were unthinkable a few years ago.  Our businesses have been tied up, gagged and forced to submit to demands and rules we cannot afford to pay or play by.  How did we allow this to happen?  Where did we go wrong in not bringing up the man or woman in the street to be obedient, docile and compliant?  Why are they not watching what we want them to watch, behaving how we want them to behave, buying what we want them to buy?

Perhaps we should learn to listen.  Instead of telling them how it should be, how we know better, how our rules are better for them in the long run.  We should have seen the writing on the wall ten years ago.  When the Internet allowed them to create, to communicate and to converse without depending on our media.  Now we must all listen to how they need us.  Because they are calling the shots.  The consumer is in control.  And we must get used to it.  OR suffer at their hands.  Over the next twenty years it is our belief that the most successful brands will merely be facilitators in what we might term “Conversational Marketing.” … Read More >>

Do You Realize That Television’s Most Formidable Competition Comes From Retail?

by Jodi Manning
December 2008

TV vs. Retail

That the store is becoming a communications medium all of its own, with colossal targeted traffic and captive eyeballs that beg to be emotionally triggered at the Critical Moment?

That trade promotion is about half of all marketing money spent today?  Or that all digital advertising segments, display, search, rich media, DVR, in-game and mobile will grow in the next five years to reach over $23.5 billion in ad spending? … Read More >>